Catchy title, isn’t it! I’m referring to my Sony RX100. Technically it’s a point and shoot camera, but that’s a good thing, really!
You may be wondering why I got myself a point and shoot (P&S) when I have so many other choices. That’s because I’m always on the the hunt for a small camera with excellent image quality. After doing quite a bit of research, I picked the Sony RX100. Yes, this is the original. There are 2 revisions to this model on the market. As nice as these newer versions are, they come with a hefty price tag and I decided that I really didn’t need the additional features. Some of these features seem like gimmicks and marketing ploys, and I probably wouldn’t use them. My primary “must haves” were excellent image quality, shoot in RAW, and it had to fit in my pocket. The RX100 does all of this, and more.
Before I share a few examples let me say that this little P&S is not a DSLR replacement much less a M43 (micro 4/3rd’s) replacement. As good as it is, it does have its limitations. One of the things that makes it so good and also the reason it won’t replace my other cameras (like my Canon 60D or Olympus E-M5) is it’s sensor. The little RX100 comes with a 1″ sensor. This is much, much larger than what typically comes in a P&S camera. The 1″ sensor is also much smaller than the sensor in either my 60D or E-M5. The other thing that makes the RX100 so good is it’s Carl Zeiss lens. It’s fast (f1.8 on the wide end) and provides excellent image quality with very little color fringing or chromatic aberration (so far). It also has an image stabilizer and can shoot up to 10 frames per second.
I probably won’t try to use my RX100 at an air show for fast moving air planes. The long end of the lenses zoom range is only 100mm, and while it can shoot 10 frames per second, it doesn’t have a view finder, either electronic or optical. It would be very difficult to track and shoot the planes as they quickly pass by using just the screen on the back of the camera. And if I did manage to grab a shot or 2 the planes would look like little dots. I would however take it along for photos of the static displays of aircraft on the ground, or in an air museum.
The main reason I got the RX100 was for those times when I don’t want to bring anything that wouldn’t fit in my pocket. There are times when even my trusty Olympus E-P3 or E-M5 can be bulky (in comparison the RX100). I’ve been on a quest to shrink my photo gear footprint for a while now. Since I got the RX100 and used it alongside my E-M5 I think I’m pretty close to where I want to be. So much so that I’m even thinking of selling a couple of my other cameras. I’ll keep the Canon 60D and big lenses mostly for air shows, the E-M5 for just about anything else, and now the RX100 as a backup or primary camera when I want to go very fast and light.
There are a lot of P&S cameras on the market. Some are ok, like the Canon S90 to S120. Nikon and Fuji also have some very good P&S cameras. I’m sold on the RX100 mainly because of the image quality and other reasons I already mentioned above. This obviously isn’t a scientific review, just my thoughts and reasoning for picking up this great little camera. Here are some examples:
The images above with the exception of RAW conversion and resizing were not “enhanced” in any other way.
That’s it for now, there will be more to follow in future posts as I’m able to spend more time with the RX100. Until next time, Happy Shooting!