Recently I wrote about using my Olympus E-M5 at an air show, and I mentioned that I would share my thoughts about using my Canon 60D in another post. Well, here it is!
I’ve been using Canon DSLR’s at air shows for many years now. Starting with my Canon XT, then my 40D, and now my 60D. It’s been quite a while since I’ve used that XT, but going back through my photos I see that the results were mixed, in other words – not that good. Some of it was due to the XT being very slow. Slow to focus and a slow frame rate (3 fps approx.). Most of it was due to my lack of skill or technique. It was easy to fix the “slow” camera part, I bought the 40D. The 40D was superior in every way compared to the XT. And to be fair, I went back to my archives of 40D air show photos, and they were indeed better. At least most of them.
How do I know they are better? Good question! I have a very bad habit of keeping almost all of my photos, good and bad. Unless they are very, very bad, I tend to keep them. This may seem like a silly waste of hard drive space, but I actually do go back to them and try to learn what went wrong. In almost all instances, the fault was with me. Poor technique. If I could consistently follow a plane in the air and pan smoothly while firing off a few frames, I’d usually nail a couple of them. If I was off by just a little, the camera wouldn’t focus where I thought it should and I would miss the shot. Then it would hunt back and forth trying to lock on.
Fast forward. The 40D has been replaced with the 60D. I’ve been to many air shows and other aviation related events and practiced. My results have been improving and overall I’m pleased, both with my equipment and my technique. The 60D is perfectly capable of air show photography, within it’s limitations (and mine).
What limitations? Another good question! I’ve shot alongside some very talented photographers, and some high dollar equipment. Hopefully this doesn’t come across as gear envy because I certainly don’t mean it that way. But being a guy that likes gear (yes, I still do believe that it’s the photographer that makes the photo), I can’t help but notice some of the differences. It doesn’t really matter what the other guy is using (usually a high dollar Canon or Nikon), I can just tell that they may not have the same limitations with their equipment as I do with mine. I’m ok with the limitations and try to work within them (just like I do when I use my E-M5).
The Canon 60D isn’t quite obsolete yet. It is still being sold in many camera stores such as B&H and Adorama. It is however, at least a few years old now and a generation behind in technology. Does that mean it can’t be used anymore and it’s time to upgrade? I’d have to say no! While the processor and sensor aren’t the latest and greatest, I find the image quality to be more than acceptable. The 60D has a great auto focus system (phase detection) and in AI Servo mode, does a very good job of tracking a subject. There aren’t as many focus points available as in the newer models, but I tend to keep mine on the center points anyway. I’d say the biggest limitation is the frame rate (fps). The 60D tops out at 5.5 fps. For fast action photography, that’s on the slow side. In fact, when the action is really heavy, I’ve missed some shots during peak times because it happened in-between frames. It doesn’t happen a lot, but it does happen. Knowing this and working with this particular limitation means that I need to anticipate the action a little more, and time my shots better.
I’ve been told that my 60D is more of a landscape camera than an action camera. That may or may not be true. I’ve used it for Little League games, auto racing, and yes, landscapes. I think of it more as a very versatile tool, able to be used for more than just special situations. The same thing goes for one of my main lenses, a Tamron 200-500. I love the reach of this very large lens, but it is also slow. It takes it a while to lock focus, especially if it starts hunting back and forth. Sometimes I’ll switch it to manual and dial it in just to get it back in the game. Is there a remedy for this? Probably not with this lens. I think I’m going to rent a Canon “L” lens for the next air show. I actually had an “L” lens in the past and there is a difference. The “L” lens is quiet and lighting fast in comparison to my Tamron.
To sum it up, I’d like to say that both my Canon 60D and my Olympus E-M5 may not be the best tools available for what I am using them for, but they aren’t the worst either. Each one has its strengths and weaknesses, like all cameras. To be successful you need to know your equipment and work within its limitations. If you’re wondering what you may be missing by not having the latest and greatest, then consider renting. If you can afford to chase technology or want the latest/greatest, then by all means go for it! For me at least, I’m going to work with what I have.
Here are some of the results from my last air show using my 60D at the LA County Air Show.
That’s it for this post, until next time – Happy Shooting!